Risk factors for severe delayed postpolypectomy bleeding

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and study aims: Postpolypectomy bleeding is a rare but serious adverse event. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with the risk of severe delayed postpolypectomy bleeding.

Patients and methods: This was a case-control study, comparing cases who developed hematochezia and required medical evaluation 6 hours to 14 days after colonoscopic polypectomy, and control patients who underwent polypectomy without delayed bleeding, and who were selected in approximately a 3 : 1 ratio. The following risk factors were specified a priori: resuming anticoagulation (within 1 week following polypectomy), aspirin use, hypertension, and polyp diameter.

Results: Of the 4592 patients who underwent colonoscopy with polypectomy, 41 patients (0.9 %) developed delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (cases), and 132 patients were selected as controls. The mean age was 64.3 years for cases and 65.4 years for controls. Cases presented on average 6 days after polypectomy (range 1 - 14 days), and 48 % required blood transfusion (average 4.2 units, range 0 - 17). Two patients required surgery. Anticoagulation was resumed following polypectomy in 34 % of cases compared with 9 % of controls (OR 5.2; 95 % CI 2.2 - 12.5; P < 0.001). For every 1 mm increase in polyp diameter, the risk of hemorrhage increased by 9 % (OR 1.09; 95 % CI 1.0 - 1.2; P = 0.008). Hypertension (OR 1.1) and aspirin use (OR 1.1) did not increase the risk of postpolypectomy bleeding. In exploratory analysis, diabetes (OR 2.5) and coronary artery disease (OR 3.0) were associated with postpolypectomy hemorrhage, but the association was no longer statistically significant once adjusted for the use of anticoagulation.

Conclusions: Resuming anticoagulation following polypectomy and polyp diameter were strongly associated with increased risk of severe delayed postpolypectomy bleeding.

References

• 1 Winawer S J, Zauber A G, O’Brien M J. et al . Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps.  N Engl J Med. 1993;  328 901-906
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Winawer S J, Zauber A G, Ho M N. et al . Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy.  N Engl J Med. 1993;  329 1977-1981
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Nelson D B, McQuaid K R, Bond J H. et al . Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 307-314
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Rex D K, Lewis B S, Waye J D. Colonoscopy and endoscopic therapy for delayed post-polypectomy hemorrhage.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 127-129
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Rosen L, Bub D S, Reed J F, Nastasee S A. Hemorrhage following colonoscopic polypectomy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;  36 1126-1131
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Gibbs D H, Opelka F G, Beck D E. et al . Postpolypectomy colonic hemorrhage.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 806-810
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Sorbi D, Norton I, Conio M. et al . Postpolypectomy lower GI bleeding: descriptive analysis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 690-696
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Hui A, Wong R MY, Ching J YL. et al . Risk of colonoscopic polypectomy bleeding with anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents: analysis of 1657 cases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 44-48
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Yousfi M, Gostout C, Baron T. et al . Postpolypectomy lower gastrointestinal bleeding: potential role of aspirin.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 1785-1789
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Heldwein W, Rosch T, Meining A. et al . The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): prospective analysis of complications and risk factors in 4000 colonic snare polypectomies.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 1116-1122
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Watabe H, Yamaji Y, Okamoto M. et al . Risk assessment for delayed hemorrhagic complication of colonic polypectomy: polyp-related factors and patient-related factors.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 73-78
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Cepeda M, Boston R, Farrar J, Strom B. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders.  Am J Epidemiol. 2003;  158 280-287
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Eisen G M, Baron T H, Dominitz J A. et al . Guideline on the management of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for endoscopic procedures.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 775-779
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Garbay J R, Suc B, Rotman N. et al . Multicentre study of surgical complications of colonoscopy.  Br J Surg. 1996;  83 42-44
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Waye J D, Lewis B S, Yessayan S. Colonoscopy: a prospective report of complications.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;  15 347-351
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Gage B, Waterman A, Shannon W. et al . Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation.  JAMA. 2001;  285 2864-2870
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

M. S. Sawhney, MD

Section of Gastroenterology
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
RABB-ROSE 101

330 Brookline Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
USA

Fax: +1-617-667-1171

Email: msawhney@bidmc.harvard.edu