Original ArticleUtility of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Endoscopic Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocysts in Selected Patients
Section snippets
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients were identified from the endoscopic database at our institution. Patients were included in this study if their records were eligible for review under current state law (no patients were excluded on this basis). Clinical and procedural details were obtained from the hospital record and the endoscopic database. Patient follow-up was performed by using a scripted telephone interview and by reviewing the records of subsequent clinic visits. The study was approved by the Mayo Foundation
RESULTS
Endoscopic ultrasonography was performed before attempted drainage in 16 patients with 17 pseudocysts and in 1 patient with an organized pancreatic necrosis (11 men and 6 women with a median age of 45 years; range, 34–75 years). The cause of the pseudocysts and pancreatic necrosis was chronic pancreatitis in 9 patients (53%) and acute pancreatitis in 8 patients (47%). Pain was the presenting symptom in all subjects. Median pseudocyst size was 8 cm (range, 5–14 cm).
Three patients did not undergo
DISCUSSION
Throughout the past 10 years, endoscopic drainage of pseudocysts has gained acceptance as a relatively noninvasive and efficacious technique.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 However, many issues regarding endoscopic drainage have yet to be resolved, including the best route of drainage (into the gut vs through the papilla) and the most efficient, most cost-effective, and safest way to establish drainage into the gastrointestinal tract.
Our data demonstrate that EUS is useful for assessing the
CONCLUSION
Our study showed the utility of EUS before attempted endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Use of EUS allows reassessment of the lesion before drainage and selection of an optimal site for controlled puncture (apposition and absence of vascular structures). Balloon dilation of the drainage site appears to be a safe technique. In addition to balloon dilation, the placement of multiple stents and routine use of prophylactic antibiotics appear to ensure drainage with little risk of
REFERENCES (22)
- et al.
Endoscopic management of cysts and pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis: long–term follow–up after 7 years of experience
Gastrointest Endosc
(1989) - et al.
Transpapillary and transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts
Gastrointest Endosc
(1995) - et al.
Treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts with ductal communication by transpapillary pancreatic duct endoprosthesis
Gastrointest Endosc
(1995) - et al.
The efficacy of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts
Gastrointest Endosc
(1995) - et al.
Endoscopic transpapillary drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts
Gastrointest Endosc
(1995) Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts continues to evolve [editorial]
Gastrointest Endosc
(1995)- et al.
Endoscopic therapy for organized pancreatic necrosis
Gastroenterology
(1996) - et al.
Endosonographic imaging of pancreatic pseudocysts before endoscopic transmural drainage
Gastrointest Endosc
(1997) Endosonography–guided cystoduodenostomy with a therapeutic ultrasound endoscope
Gastrointest Endosc
(1996)- et al.
Transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections without electrocautery using the Seldinger technique
Gastrointest Endosc
(1998)
Ultrasound catheter probe–assisted endoscopic cystgastros–tomy
Gastrointest Endosc
Cited by (79)
EUS-Guided Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections
2014, Endosonography, Third editionEUS-Guided Drainage of the Biliary and Pancreatic Ductal Systems
2014, Endosonography, Third editionEndoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst. Practical features
2011, Gastroenterologia y HepatologiaEUS-guided Drainage of the Biliary and Pancreatic Ductal Systems
2011, EndosonographyEUS-Guided Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocysts
2011, Endosonography
Presented in part at Digestive Disease Week, New Orleans, La, May 19, 1998.
Dr Norton is supported by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/Olympus Endoscopic Training Scholarship.