Cost-effectiveness of telaprevir in combination with pegylated interferon alpha and ribavirin in previously untreated chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients

J Med Econ. 2014 Jan;17(1):65-76. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.860033. Epub 2013 Nov 18.

Abstract

Background: Telaprevir (T, TVR) is a direct-acting antiviral (DAA) used for the treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The sustained virological response (SVR) rates, i.e., undetectable HCV RNA levels 24 weeks after the end of treatment, is what differentiate treatments. This analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of TVR combined with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) alfa-2a plus ribavirin (RBV), with Peg-IFN and RBV (PR) alone or with boceprevir (B, BOC) plus Peg-IFN alfa-2b and RBV, in naïve patients.

Methods: A Markov cohort model of chronic HCV disease progression reflected the pathway of naïve patients initiating anti-HCV therapy. SVR rates were derived from a mixed-treatment comparison including results from Phase II and III trials of TVR and BOC, and trials comparing both PR regimens. SVR has significant impact on survival, quality-of-life, and costs. Incremental cost per life year (LY) gained and quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) gained were computed at lifetime, adopting the (National Health Service) NHS perspective. Cost and health outcomes were discounted at 3.5%. Uncertainty was assessed using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Sub-group analyses were also performed by interleukin (IL)-28B genotype and fibrosis stage.

Results: Higher costs and improved outcomes were associated with T/PR relative to PR alone, resulting in an ICER of £12,733 per QALY gained. T/PR retained a significant SVR advantage over PR alone and was cost-effective regardless of IL-28B genotype and fibrosis stages. T/PR regimen 'dominated' B/PR, generating 0.2 additional QALYs and reducing lifetime cost by £2758. Sensitivity analyses consistently resulted in ICERs less than £30,000/QALY for the T/PR regimen over PR alone.

Limitations: No head-to-head trial provides direct evidence of better efficacy of T/PR vs B/PR.

Conclusion: The introduction of TVR-based therapy for genotype 1 HCV patients is cost-effective for naïve patients at the £30,000 willingness-to-pay threshold, regardless of IL-28B genotype or fibrosis stage.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antiviral Agents / economics*
  • Antiviral Agents / therapeutic use
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Health Resources / economics
  • Health Resources / statistics & numerical data
  • Hepacivirus / drug effects
  • Hepatitis C, Chronic / drug therapy*
  • Humans
  • Interferon alpha-2
  • Interferon-alpha / economics*
  • Interferon-alpha / therapeutic use
  • Markov Chains
  • Oligopeptides / economics*
  • Oligopeptides / therapeutic use
  • Polyethylene Glycols / economics*
  • Polyethylene Glycols / therapeutic use
  • Recombinant Proteins / economics
  • Recombinant Proteins / therapeutic use
  • Ribavirin / economics*
  • Ribavirin / therapeutic use
  • Survival Analysis

Substances

  • Antiviral Agents
  • Interferon alpha-2
  • Interferon-alpha
  • Oligopeptides
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Polyethylene Glycols
  • Ribavirin
  • telaprevir
  • peginterferon alfa-2b
  • peginterferon alfa-2a