Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of midazolam and diazepam

Gastrointest Endosc. 1989 Mar-Apr;35(2):82-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(89)72713-9.

Abstract

Comparison of the ease of upper endoscopy, patient tolerance, and amnestic effect, using diazepam, midazolam, or no sedation, was performed on 149 patients. Midazolam and diazepam sedation produced better conditions and improved patient acceptability. Midazolam was associated with better patient tolerance, less thrombophlebitis, and more amnesia than diazepam, but shared a similar recovery time. Midazolam should replace diazepam as the drug of choice in those patients requiring sedation for upper endoscopy.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Controlled Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Diazepam* / adverse effects
  • Endoscopy / methods*
  • Endoscopy / psychology
  • Female
  • Fiber Optic Technology
  • Gagging
  • Gastrointestinal Diseases / diagnosis
  • Humans
  • Intubation, Gastrointestinal
  • Male
  • Memory / drug effects
  • Midazolam* / adverse effects
  • Middle Aged
  • Premedication*
  • Random Allocation
  • Thrombophlebitis / chemically induced

Substances

  • Diazepam
  • Midazolam