The Efficacy and Safety of First-line Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophagogastric Cancer: A Network Meta-analysis

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Aug 30;108(10). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw166. Print 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Background: A globally accepted standard first-line chemotherapy regimen in advanced esophagogastric cancer (AEGC) is not clearly established. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy using Network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods: Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and conferences were searched until June 2015 for randomized controlled trials that compared regimens containing: fluoropyrimidine (F), platinum (cisplatin [C] and oxaliplatin [Ox]), taxane (T), anthracycline (A), irinotecan (I), or methotrexate (M). Direct and indirect evidence for overall survival (OS) and progression-free-survival (PFS) were combined using random-effects NMA on the hazard ratio (HR) scale and calculated as combined hazard ratios and 95% credible intervals (CrIs).

Results: The NMA incorporated 17 chemotherapy regimens with 37 direct comparisons between regimens for OS (50 studies, n = 10 249) and 29 direct comparisons for PFS (34 studies, n = 7795). Combining direct and indirect effects showed increased efficacy for fluoropyrimidine noncisplatin doublets (F-doublets) over cisplatin doublets (C-doublets): FI vs CF (combined HR = 0.85, 95% CrI = 0.71 to 0.99), FOx vs CF (combined HR = 0.83, 95% CrI = 0.71 to 0.98) in OS and FOx vs CF (combined HR = 0.82, 95% CrI = 0.66 to 0.99) in PFS. Anthracycline-containing triplets (A-triplets: ACF, AFOx, AFM) and TCF triplet showed no benefit over F-doublets in OS and PFS. The triplet FOxT showed increased PFS vs F-doublets FT (combined HR = 0.61, 95% CrI = 0.38 to 0.99), FI (combined HR = 0.62, 95% CrI = 0.38 to 0.99), and FOx (combined HR = 0.67, 95% CrI = 0.44 to 0.99). Increased grade 3 to 4 toxicity was found for CF vs F-doublets, for ACF vs FI for TCF vs CF, and for FOxT vs FOx.

Conclusions: Based on efficacy and toxicity, F-doublets FOx, FI, and FT are preferred as first-line treatment for AEGC compared with C-doublets, A-triplets, and TCF. FOxT is the most promising triplet.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Anthracyclines / administration & dosage
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Bridged-Ring Compounds / administration & dosage
  • Camptothecin / administration & dosage
  • Camptothecin / analogs & derivatives
  • Capecitabine / administration & dosage
  • Cisplatin / administration & dosage
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Drug Combinations
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / mortality
  • Esophagogastric Junction*
  • Fluorouracil / administration & dosage
  • Humans
  • Irinotecan
  • Methotrexate / administration & dosage
  • Network Meta-Analysis
  • Organoplatinum Compounds / administration & dosage
  • Oxaliplatin
  • Oxonic Acid / administration & dosage
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Stomach Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Survival Rate
  • Taxoids / administration & dosage
  • Tegafur / administration & dosage

Substances

  • Anthracyclines
  • Bridged-Ring Compounds
  • Drug Combinations
  • Organoplatinum Compounds
  • Taxoids
  • Oxaliplatin
  • S 1 (combination)
  • Tegafur
  • taxane
  • Oxonic Acid
  • Capecitabine
  • Irinotecan
  • Cisplatin
  • Fluorouracil
  • Camptothecin
  • Methotrexate